+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: RightDrive in Toronto Star - article oon RHD's in Ontario

  1. #1
    Matty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Crystal Beach, ON
    Posts
    2,150

    RightDrive in Toronto Star - article oon RHD's in Ontario

    We were recently interviewed for an article in the Star. If anyone has had any doibt about RHD's in Ontario, both the RIV and MTO have come out and said they have no intentions of making any law changes for them in Ontario.





    You can read the full article on our site here...http://www.rightdrive.ca/news/view/29


    Stay tuned guys! I promise we have BIG things coming in 2010 that will change the game. It's our year!

  2. #2
    GTRCer Shadao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kootenays BC Canada
    Posts
    2,130
    i just HATE how they, the media; always says "due to a loop hole in canadas importation laws" and " it is exempt from federal safety standards "

    such BS its not a loop hole. and they are not exempt from safety standards, every single one of these vehicles has been inspected at least once, my car didnt pass its inspection due to tie rod ends, got new ones and passed she did, along with all the other junk we gotta do of course.

    this is a step in the right direction and good on you for that... just make sure that the media knows that we are not exploiting some loop hole... it sounds bad. we are following the laws put forth thats not a loop hole
    How many kids with A.D.D. does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    Wanna go ride bikes...

    R.I.P \'87 4cyl Rustang
    \'03 Dodge SX2.0
    \'90 GTR32

  3. #3
    Matty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Crystal Beach, ON
    Posts
    2,150
    Agreed 100%
    That terminology needs to be addressed since it make the whole thing sound sketchy.

    The writer may be coming back to our shop soon though.

  4. #4
    GTRCer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lambridge (cambridge), ON
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadao View Post
    i just HATE how they, the media; always says "due to a loop hole in canadas importation laws" and " it is exempt from federal safety standards "

    such BS its not a loop hole. and they are not exempt from safety standards, every single one of these vehicles has been inspected at least once, my car didnt pass its inspection due to tie rod ends, got new ones and passed she did, along with all the other junk we gotta do of course.

    this is a step in the right direction and good on you for that... just make sure that the media knows that we are not exploiting some loop hole... it sounds bad. we are following the laws put forth thats not a loop hole
    I know what you mean, the thing that i find stupid is that the cars imported into Canada (at least by GTRC's awesome sponsors like rightdrive.ca) are in MUCH better condition then any POS domestic car of the same age.

    Look at pretty much any 89-93 car and unless it's been stored, or restored, it's got 300,000+ km and rust holes. Then you look at the same ones being imported, most are less or slightly over 100,000km with virtually no rust!

  5. #5
    GTRCer
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    114
    love the picture! going through timmies backwards haha. Havent done that yet..
    '94 White Nissan Skyline R33 - HKS Tuned.. (SOLD)

    tune2mod.com

  6. #6
    RixR32's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sarnia, Ont
    Posts
    775
    Quote Originally Posted by Wants_a_GTR View Post
    Look at pretty much any 89-93 car and unless it's been stored, or restored, it's got 300,000+ km and rust holes. Then you look at the same ones being imported, most are less or slightly over 100,000km with virtually no rust!
    Haha. Quoted for truth.
    Good luck even FINDING a 89-93 N/A ANYTHING around here thats even road-worthy. Or would pass a safety for that matter.

    Good article. I'm glad the MTO is at least being smart about THIS.

    I agree the "loophole" term needs to be squashed. We are following Canada's 15 year import LAW. Not LOOPHOLE.

    The cars still need to pass the MTO's Safety and Emmision tests, to the standards of any other car the same age. They are not "exempt" from this.


    Rick
    '89 GTST - restored to near showroom (FOR SALE)
    '92 GTR - latest project, not far behind..already fresh engine!!
    '94 Mitsubishi Pajero Super Exceed 2.8TD LWB (my daily)
    '10 Mazda 3 Sport Hatch (wifey's)

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts