+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: V8 Rwd 6speed Fia Gt1 Gtr

  1. #1
    GTRCer
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    whitby
    Posts
    143

    V8 Rwd 6speed FIA GT1 GTR



    Nissan revealed earlier this year that they will be making a competitive entry into the FIA GT Championship for 2010 with a Nissan R35 GT-R built to GT1 specifications. In collaboration with NISMO and Gigawave Motorsports the car will be entered into four races in 2009 for testing and development. The first race it will be entered into is Silverstone, round 1 on May 3rd 2009.

    Today specifications are out and the car was photographed testing at the Paul Ricard HTTT facility in the south of France during the media function and first official test day for the 2009 championship season.

    As predicted the GT1 GT-R features a front mounted naturally aspirated V8 engine, a VK56DE with a displacement of 5,552cc. The VK develops 600hp and more than 650Nm of torque. It’s mated to a Ricardo 6 speed transaxle via a 5.5″ carbon triple plate clutch. All this drives only the rear wheels. Carbon brakes and pads all round are clamped by 6 piston front and 6 piston rear calipers. Putting the power to the ground are 18″ x 13″ Rays forged wheels all round.

    More updates to come as the day progresses…

    Photos: David Fontayne, Laurent Mercier, ZeroToHundred.com
    Link: ZeroToHundred.com: FIA GT1 Spec: 600hp R35 GTR












    R35 NISSAN GT-R to the 2010 FIA GT1 Regulation

    Type of engine: VK56DE
    Displacement: 5552 cc
    Max. horsepower: 600hp according to the 2010 regulation
    Max. torque: > 650Nm
    Clutch: 5.5″carbon triple plate
    Type of gearbox: Ricardo 6 speed transaxle Overall length: 4730 mm
    Overall width: 2040 mm
    Wheelbase: 2780 mm
    Track (front): 1670 mm
    Track (Rear): 1710 mm
    Weight: 1250kg according to the 2010 regulation
    Brake (front): 6 piston caliper with carbon disc and pad
    Brake (rear): 6 piston caliper with carbon disc and pad
    Type of suspension (front): Double wishbone suspension
    Type of suspension (rear): Multi-link suspension
    Drive system: RWD
    Wheel (front): 13.0J×18
    Wheel (rear): 13.0J×18
    Tire (front): 31/71-18
    Tire (rear): 31/71-18
    __________________

  2. #2
    GTRCer Browny_R31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    774
    thats hot as hell!!!!!

  3. #3
    GTRCer Skym's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South
    Posts
    6,702
    I like.

    Looks better than the factory car. Maybe they will convert that look into a road spec version, like they did with the 400R and Z-tune???
    The most epic signature ever "epic".

    Yes, indeed, Let's Roll, (Yes, Let's ride the automobile)

  4. #4
    GTRCer doublejceballos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Abbotsford, British Columbia
    Posts
    2,048
    wow
    fantastic
    Quote Originally Posted by Oakville View Post
    that, is what us oakvillians like to call an 'instabone'

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,913
    I have this huge feeling someone ****** that press release up a bit.

    those fronts are not 18x13, no way. Tires are not even the same size.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,111
    I just came in my pants.

    That thing is hot and if they did run 18x13-inchers all around that would be hardcore.

    Igor used to run 12s all round on his AutomotiveForums.com R34 wearing a 315mm IIRC.

  7. #7
    GTRCer Skym's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South
    Posts
    6,702
    You should hear what this GT1 R35GTR sounds like in this videoclip -

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DEmS...eature=related

    At 2:52 you get a better view/angle of how quick this GT1 R35GTR is.
    The most epic signature ever "epic".

    Yes, indeed, Let's Roll, (Yes, Let's ride the automobile)

  8. #8
    GTRCer kelaog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Coquitlam (Vancouver) BC
    Posts
    2,898
    Anyone aware of what compression ratio the vk56DE is running?
    I'd like to know how nissan go that much power out of an NA motor

    Aside from headwork/porting/lightweigh components etc.

    I'm just wondering how honda can make a 2 litre engine with 210 horsepower (50 ft/lbs of torque) and ford makes a 4.6 litre monster v8 that makes just 270 horsepower and 300ftlbs. lol... Though I have been contemplating 11:1 pistons and some new heads on my v8 to put it up to about 450whp and well over 550ft lbs of torque on an NA motor... lol.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by kelaog View Post
    I'm just wondering how honda can make a 2 litre engine with 210 horsepower (50 ft/lbs of torque) and ford makes a 4.6 litre monster v8 that makes just 270 horsepower and 300ftlbs. lol... Though I have been contemplating 11:1 pistons and some new heads on my v8 to put it up to about 450whp and well over 550ft lbs of torque on an NA motor... lol.
    Don't you mean Honda makes 240hp in the 2.0L F20C 1st gen S2000?

    FWIW: Current NA 4.6L is 300hp and the Bullitt is 315hp/325tq

    I believe the most hp/L V8 is the RS4: 420hp with 4.2L

  10. #10
    GTRCer RyanGTS-T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    1,811
    Quote Originally Posted by kelaog View Post
    Anyone aware of what compression ratio the vk56DE is running?
    I'd like to know how nissan go that much power out of an NA motor

    Aside from headwork/porting/lightweigh components etc.

    I'm just wondering how honda can make a 2 litre engine with 210 horsepower (50 ft/lbs of torque) and ford makes a 4.6 litre monster v8 that makes just 270 horsepower and 300ftlbs. lol... Though I have been contemplating 11:1 pistons and some new heads on my v8 to put it up to about 450whp and well over 550ft lbs of torque on an NA motor... lol.
    It's also a race spec motor. So it's setup for running at higher rpms for long periods of time.

    Put it this way,

    Honda has a higher reving motor so they make the power up at the higher end which means it makes less torque on the lower end.

    Now your Mustang makes it's power off the the line having a medium range setup. More low end power to create tones of torque off the line and get you moving up to speed quickly. And you can idle up hills in 5th gear at 1,000 rpms with your foot off the gas, that was pretty cool too. Try doing that in a honda, it would be like putting the clutch in and holding it down resulting in you rolling back down the hill.

    All in all, honda's may make 210 horse power but it will take you 5-10 minutes to get it up to the point where you are using it all unlike the Mustang that will be using it's 270 horse power all the time.
    Now this is how you reload a gun!!!
    http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r...bullitsrl8.gif

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts