On that chart I see 600hp. Isn't the 08 GTR less than that? Then again, the specs say 480, that's pretty close.![]()
No build thread.
1991 nissan
El terror
wait a minute..... wouldn't you use NM for torque rating? and KW for power rating?
So that means....456hp and 442lb/ft.
I wish the old one's had torque ratings that close to the hp rating.
torque is a factor of dispacement and boost pressure.
horsepower is a factor of torque x RPM.
if you want to make more torque than horsepower, limit RPM's, or run small turbos that make lots of torque and not lots of horsepower.
the RB26 is a small displacement, high revving motor. Add displacement or take away revs and you'll see similarly matched numbers.
1992 GTR
1988 Mazda RX-7 10AE
1999 F250 Superduty 7.3L Turbo (tow vehicle)
Are the differences just because they were hand made? Isn't that kinda crappy that you can have a stock GTR and your friend can have a stock GTR and yet it can be a huge difference in the specs?
Its weird cause i thought it had 485 WHP stock but I've also seen youtube vids of the dyno chart said its only putting out 432 hp/424 ft-lb (this is just the most recent one i saw) Is there really that big of a gap?!?!![]()
Double track drift, yo.
http://www.meh.ro/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/meh.ro5228.gif
(o▫o sκylιnε o▫o)
Each dyno result is different, ie dynojet, dynapack, mustang etc. Along with other factors.
This is on an engine dyno. As a far as each being different, I dont buy that. If they are assembled by hand using the same specs how much difference can there be? probably more consistent then machines doing it.
Bookmarks