Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dan's R32 - more fun than a barrel of Aventadors

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Bump. It this alive Dan?

    Comment


    • #62
      Yep. Back on the road this summer. I've been busy with a bunch of other stuff and have not been super active on the board (understatement!) but I'm enjoying the car.
      sigpic
      The Beaumont Connection

      Comment


      • #63
        Dyno curve with 1 mm oversized valves and different cams - so you can't make an apples to apples comparison around valves. Didn't want to change cams, but they got swapped out as part of a troubleshooting process.


        Here's the previous tune. Note that torque comes on later and over a narrower rev range, which has the effect of making the power feel less linear.
        sigpic
        The Beaumont Connection

        Comment


        • #64
          Is it on 91 octane and -5? What cams are they?

          Comment


          • #65
            rev her out a little further!
            oh hai!

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Black BNR32 View Post
              rev her out a little further!
              You are reading my mind. Valves, springs, and retainers are all lightweight and rev friendly.
              sigpic
              The Beaumont Connection

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by leung23c View Post
                Is it on 91 octane and -5? What cams are they?
                That's 91 octane -5's and Tomei PonCams. Not sure which ones...
                sigpic
                The Beaumont Connection

                Comment


                • #68
                  I like.

                  E85 / pump gas mix (methonal compatible fuel system to suit) + ECU tune to suit and 50-100hp at same boost level. Turbo's are hp rated on pump gas.

                  Reving engine more = more load on bottomend and not conrod friendly. Also a hole in the side of the block from the conrod snapping.
                  Last edited by Skym; 02-08-2015, 11:16 PM.
                  RESPONSE MONSTER

                  The most epic signature ever "epic".

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Skym View Post
                    Reving engine more = more load on bottomend and not conrod friendly. Also a hole in the side of the block from the conrod snapping.
                    True enough. Peak load condition is at TDC between exhaust and intake strokes from reversing piston direction with no compression in the cylinder.

                    Rods in this engine are Tomei H-beams and should be up for the ride, particularly if you don't go there all the time. "I don't always rev to 8500, but when I do..."

                    I'm actually curious to see where it'll run out of breath...
                    sigpic
                    The Beaumont Connection

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by GTR-Dad View Post
                      Rods in this engine are Tomei H-beams and should be up for the ride, particularly if you don't go there all the time. "I don't always rev to 8500, but when I do..."
                      True, has to be constant load and for a certain amount of cycles, but still shortens the lifespan of the conrod.

                      H beam conrods allow for more reliability at the same revs, but have snapped when reving engine more than recommended.

                      But it's your engine and your decision at the end of the day.
                      RESPONSE MONSTER

                      The most epic signature ever "epic".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X