Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

tuning round 3 dyno sheet!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    well i went from a dynojet to a mustang.. mustang was reading 20hp lower.. the thing is that mustang dyno can vary from 25% between each dyno so to my opinions, mustang dyno should retire because of theyre lack of constancy.
    Need detailing done to your car? I'm open to travel to detail your car :

    http://forums.gtrcanada.com/group-buys/54899-ontario-cobraa-detailing-group-buy.html

    Please follow my works and latest news/promotion at : https://www.facebook.com/Waxxonspa || Waxxon.com ||

    Comment


    • #17
      Im still impress with your number because the only difference between you and me is the twin vs single and the poncam over the 270 10.25. I would be interesting to know when the boost built up.

      I doubt your cam vs mine make THAT much of a difference so it's all in the turbo setup.
      Need detailing done to your car? I'm open to travel to detail your car :

      http://forums.gtrcanada.com/group-buys/54899-ontario-cobraa-detailing-group-buy.html

      Please follow my works and latest news/promotion at : https://www.facebook.com/Waxxonspa || Waxxon.com ||

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by cobrAA View Post
        mustang dyno should retire because of theyre lack of constancy.
        No, you stick with same dyno and it won't matter.



        Unless you want huge e-peens to impress men online on car forumz.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by leeaspin View Post
          29 psi is gunna be insane btw LOL!!! Again make sure you take a video and post it!!!!!!
          yea it should be pretty crazy! im kinda happy im only running 12psi for now gives me time to get used to the power lol. ill try and post up the videos that i have now but they are on my brothers phone. ill work on it
          1991 Nissan Skyline R32 GT-R: 710whp 521 ft/lbs 27.5psi 11.8 @126mph low boost

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by cobrAA View Post
            well i went from a dynojet to a mustang.. mustang was reading 20hp lower.. the thing is that mustang dyno can vary from 25% between each dyno so to my opinions, mustang dyno should retire because of theyre lack of constancy.
            this is not just any mustang dyno tho rgs dyno is notorious for reading low! but a number is just a number doesnt really mean **** all. and our power descrepiencies is all in the turbo kit, cooling system, head set up... etc. im making full boost at about ~4500rpm or so.
            1991 Nissan Skyline R32 GT-R: 710whp 521 ft/lbs 27.5psi 11.8 @126mph low boost

            Comment


            • #21
              Yes lookin good! Cant wait for my 6boost mani to get here

              Who built the motor?

              Comment


              • #22
                Also what ECU?

                Comment


                • #23
                  i was so happy when my 6boost mani showed up. i even paid 167 bucks for fed ex priority over night. evolution auto in new west (allan) built the motor. running a power fc djetro (map based ) ecu
                  1991 Nissan Skyline R32 GT-R: 710whp 521 ft/lbs 27.5psi 11.8 @126mph low boost

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Ah gotcha! Ya Kyle shipped my manifold on Friday! Shoulda paid for faster shipping haha.

                    Where did you take the MAP source from? Cyl 2&3?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      tapped ports into cyl 2 and 4
                      1991 Nissan Skyline R32 GT-R: 710whp 521 ft/lbs 27.5psi 11.8 @126mph low boost

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Hey man, post the link to the other forum thread, i really would love to see some pics!)
                        TTBB is a true ACN member

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X